28. februar 2014

Egyptian partial independence

On 28 February 1922 Egypt was recognized by its colonial master Britain as an independent sovereign state. For centuries Egypt had been ruled by foreigners - for decades Egyptians had struggled for positions and justice - for years this had taken a clear nationalist character. But the British retained control in vital areas: The Suez Canal, defence against foreign aggression, protection of foreign interests and minority rights and Sudan. As part of the struggle, military officers had entered politics. For the next 32 years Egypt and Britain would negotiate their relationship, before officers took power and Egypt gained full independence. Today in 2014 the military has taken power again. It may be useful to know a bit more about the background to understand why.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a8/ModernEgypt%2C_Saad_Zaghloul%2C_BAP_14785.jpg
Saad Zaghloul Egyptian revolutionary and statesman.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Allenby.jpg
Edmund Allenby, British High Commissioner for Egypt (1919-25).
Background
Egypt was ruled by the Mamluk generals from 1250. They were originally Christian slave soldiers who had elevated to political power and founded a dynasty. The Turkish Ottoman’s power grew over the next centuries and the Ottoman Sultan Selim the Grim conquered Egypt in 1517. It marks the beginning of the modern age in the Arab world. The Ottomans ruled over the greatest Islamic empire of the world, and for the first time since the rise of Islam the Arabs were ruled from a non-Arab capital, Istanbul. But this was long before nationalism entered the world, and the Arabs didn’t seem to mind Ottoman rule. The Ottomans had an efficient bureaucracy, a strong army that protected against foreign threats and gave a lot of freedom to local religious and cultural traditions. The Mamluks kept a lot of their position and power, although they rebelled against Istanbul and sought independence several times over the next centuries.


Napoleon comes
Then in 1798 Napoleon conquered Egypt to block France’s rival Britain from the access over the Mediterranean to India. The French stayed for 3 years and the encounter with their customs and technology was a shock to many Egyptians. The British destroyed the French fleet and forced them out. An Ottoman commander from Albania, Muhammad Ali became governor. He was a strong ruler and made reforms based on European inventions and ideas including a peasant mass army, industrialization, and printing press. His dynasty would rule Egypt until 1952.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d9/Mouhamed_ali_army&navy.jpg
Ali established a dynasty that ruled Egypt until 1952, and also a modern navy.

The Suez Canal
One of his sons Said Pasha, educated in Paris let his former French tutor Ferdinand de Lesseps construct the Suez Canal. Of enormous cost to Egypt and importance to shipping, it made control over Egypt even more important to European powers. The Suez Canal opened under Muhammad Ali’s grandson Ismail Pasha. He took the title Khedive (viceroy) and continued modernization of Egypt with European-style buildings and broad gas-lighted streets in Cairo. In 1866 he created a Consultative Council of Deputies which opened for broader participation of Egyptians in politics. But Ismail Pasha had taken up foreign loans, and was unable to pay them back. Egypt went bankrupt and he sold the Egyptian government’s shares in the Suez Canal Company to the British government at a loss of 75% in1875. Formally Egypt was still an Ottoman province, but Europeans gained more and more influence over Egypt’s economy and politics.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c9/Suez_Canal_Ismailia2.jpg
The Suez Canal at Ismailia c. 1860.

Egyptian struggle for equity and positions
Turkish-speaking officers dominated the Egyptian army, looked down on the Egyptians and displaced merits for advancement. An Egyptian Colonel, Ahmad Urabi, found this intolerable and gained support from the landed elite and Egyptian soldiers. After a disastrous invasion of Ethiopia, costs were to be cut in the Army. Egyptians were to be dismissed in 1881, and Urabi and colleagues mutinied, and the Khedive gave in to the demands. This was the first time Egyptian military involved itself in politics, which they have continued to do until today. Although they had the slogan “Egypt for Egyptians” they were not nationalist as they accepted the Ottoman sultan. Urabi became Minister of War, detained Ottoman officers and forced the Prime minister to dismiss European officials. Britain and France got worried and used gunboat diplomacy. Urabi held out. Then Britain sent an invasion force in 1882 and occupied Egypt. Urabi was captured and sent in exile to Ceylon. But the British Lord Cromer relaxed constraints on the press and many newspapers were established in Egypt.
 
Women demonstrating during the 1919 revolution.
 
Growing nationalism
Along with the European ideas came nationalism, a product of the 18th century enlightenment in Europe. Muslim clerics sought to make an Islamic response to imperialism. Another group worked on a secular nationalism. Some women also began to ask for more gender equality and freedom, but they were met with strong resistance from the male-dominated society. Debates grew, and nationalism slowly grew, but the British did little to provoke. They mixed little with Egyptians and kept a stable, regular government and low taxes. Then in 1906 a British pigeon hunting party in Dinshaway in the Nile delta met resistance from Egyptians who were living of the birds. A British officer was killed, and they retaliated by executing four Egyptians and punishing others severely. Newspapers and folk poets distributed the events and Egyptian reacted strongly to this injustice.  Things calmed down, but Dinshaway was not forgotten.
World War I
During the First World War Britain made Egypt a Protectorate. The war brought hardships to Egypt and when it was over people expected rewards for their efforts. The leaders had listened to US President Wilson’s famous Fourteen points, including national sovereignty. They wanted to send a delegation (Wafd) led by Sad Zaghlul to the Versailles Peace conference, but the British refused. Zaghlul and others were arrested and deported to Malta. An uprising started and evolved to an Egyptian revolution in 1919 with sabotage, strikes and demonstrations. Women participated actively forming the first women’s political bodies in the Arab world. It all turned into the first nationalist movement in Arab history. Finally the British gave in, released Zaghlul, and the Wafd went to Versailles. To their disappointment the US delegation had just accepted the British protectorate. President Wilson’s statement came to nothing more than words as the European powers resisted. The Egyptian nationalist didn’t give up but continued with civil disorder and negotiations. To preserve order and stability the British gave in and accepted Egyptian sovereignty on 28 February.


I am open to your comments and proposals.
Warmly
Bjarte Bjørsvik

27. februar 2014

Morocco still occupies Western Sahara

On 27 February 1976 the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic was proclaimed on the territory of Western Sahara by the Polisario national liberation movement. Until the day before it had been a Spanish colony. But Morocco had already occupied the northern two-thirds of the territory on 6 November 1975, and Mauritania the southern third. A huge part of the population fled to Algeria where they have stayed since in the Tindouf refugee camp. The Sahrawis had formed Polisario to fight the Spanish, now they fought and pushed out Mauritania. Mauritania gave up its claim in 1979, but Morocco annexed the southern part.

The United Nations (UN) mediated an agreement including a ceasefire, and a referendum where the people would decide whether they wanted Western Sahara to be independent or a part of Morocco. Morocco has declined the Sahrawis to hold the referendum. They have moved in over 250.000 Moroccans and have offered a referendum  where they will vote. Morocco takes out huge amounts of phosphate and fish, and explore for oil and gas.  At the same time Moroccan forces violently supress the local Sahrawi population. The Rafto Foundation for Human Rights awarded the Rafto prize to the human rights activist Sidi Mohammed Daddach in 2002.

There is a need for more clear and strong support from the international community. Primarily I ask the members of the UN Security Council to implement the UN declarations, including a referendum on the future of Western Sahara.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/34/RASD_-_Commemoration_of_the_30th_independence_day_in_the_Liberated_Territories_(2005).jpg
Commemoration of the 30th independence day from Spain in the Liberated Territories.
Background
The Spanish made the coastal region a protectorate in 1884 and later occupied the interior and made it a colony Spanish Sahara. They discovered huge phosphate deposits in Bu Craa in the 1960s, and built a plant extracting the valuable mineral which is used in fertilizers. The nomadic Sahrawis slowly got national and anticolonial sentiments. They formed Polisario in the early 1970s fighting the Spanish. Spain decided to pull out, but agreed with Morocco and Mauritania to split the land between them. International Court of Justice (ICJ) in The Hague refused Morocco’s and Mauretania’s claims for sovereignty over distinct parts of Western Sahara. But even though the Spanish government didn’t have the authority to give away the sovereignty, it allowed Morocco and Mauritania to occupy Spanish Sahara before they pulled out in 1976.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/22/Westernsaharamap.png
Map of Western Sahara.Territories.

Cease-fire but no referendum
The United Nations have a mandate to decolonize former colonies, including Western Sahara. This is the only African territory left on the UN-list. The UN made a peace proposal in 1988 which Morocco and Polisario accepted. The UN established the United Nations Mission for the Referendum in Western Sahara (MINURSO) to monitor the ceasefire and prepare for the referendum. Morocco has not agreed to the terms, and no referendum has been held. Instead Morocco built a wall through the country and occupies the land west of it. Polisario holds the part east of the wall. Morocco continues to extract huge amounts of phosphate, and fish in the sea. They are also exploring for oil and gas in the ocean, contracting foreign oil companies to do the job. Several companies have pulled out after pressure from groups supporting the Sahrawis, but Total is searching in 2014. Because of this they have been excluded from the Norwegian Pension scheme (KLP).
 
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/ad/Western_sahara_walls_moroccan_map-en.svg
Map of the different walls Morocco has built.
 
Human rights violations
Moroccan security forces have carried out gross violations on the Sahrawi population, hundreds have disappeared, others have been imprisoned, and many more harassed. Sidi Mohammed Daddach, a Sahrawi human rights defender won the Rafto prize from the Norwegian Rafto Foundation for Human Rights. Amnesty International says Moroccan forces continue to target human rights activists and imprison and torture demonstrators in the 2013 annual report. France has refused to give MINURSO a mandate to observe the human rights situation.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/05/Tamekinprison.jpg
Sahrawi human rights defender Ali Salem Tamek in the Moroccan Ait Meloul Prison.
External support
Morocco has gained recognition from several Arab League countries and gets support from France and the US. So they are reluctant to implement UN Declarations and hold a referendum. The Sahrawis on the other hand is supported by Algeria, and is recognized by the African Union.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/ce/Aminatouhaidartinoccupiedsahara.jpg
Sahrawi women.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/98/Sahrawi_with_flag.jpg
A Sahrawi man with the flag of Western Sahara.

 
Sources and more information
http://www.un.org/en/decolonization/nonselfgovterritories.shtml
 
I am open to your comments and proposals.
Warmly
Bjarte Bjørsvik

26. februar 2014

Berlin conference shares Africa

After months of negotiations European powers end the West Africa conference in Berlin on 26 February 1885. This is the era of new imperialism. In addition to the old colonial powers, Britain, France, Spain and Portugal, Russia and the Netherlands, new countries have gone through the first phase of the industrial revolution. Germany, the US, Belgium, Italy and Japan are able and eager to exploit the second phase of it with mass-produced steel, electric power, oil, industrial chemistry and other innovations. Large scale production facilities requiring huge capital, banking and financial markets are evolving rapidly. The technological advances have made it possible to transport raw materials and goods over huge distances in a relatively safe and cheap way. The old and new powers compete to conquer and rule new territories for raw materials and markets.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/5c/Afrikakonferenz.jpg
Participants at the 1884-85 conference of Berlin.

Until now only Britain, France and Portugal have colonies in Africa south of the Sahara, and they are limited to the coast. But explorers, missionaries and traders are going to the interior of Africa. Henry Morton Stanley explores the Congo River in the 1870s and King Leopold of Belgium becomes interested. He forms a group of investors that finance Stanley’s establishment of stations signing 450 treaties with independent African entities. Now he wants acceptance of the other Europeans in competition with Portugal.


http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/39/Leopold_ii_garter_knight.jpg
King Leopold II.  

It is in this context the gathering in Berlin takes place. They agree and sign a General Act which gives freedom of trade, neutrality and navigation in the Congo basin, prohibit slave trade and rules on occupation of Africa. They also agree on the Niger River. In practice King Leopold of Belgium gets what he wanted, and establishes the Congo Free State of 2.3 million km2 as his private property. He is hailed then as a civilizer, but in reality rubber, palm oil, ivory ant other resources are taken out by forced labor. Leopold’s agents, Force Publique, kidnap families of Congolese men. If the men don’t fulfil the high work quotas, they cut hands of women and children. They also slaughter men, rape women and burn huts. The exploitation and brutality cause the death of 10 million according to Yale University referring to historian Adam Hochshild. Journalists and politicians are bribed to not disclose the reality. When it is finally revealed, by British citizens, indignation in Europe forces Leopold to transfer Congo to the Belgium government as a colony in 1908. France gets Congo- Brazzaville, Portugal achieves Angola, and the others shared most of Africa.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/52/MutilatedChildrenFromCongo.jpg
Children and wives had hands cut off when the men failed to meet rubber collection quotas.

In the 75 first years of the 19th century, the colonial powers added an average of 240.000 km2 of land to their colonies each year. From the late 1870s to World War I, this increased to 620.00 km2.
The only territories not colonized were Ethiopia which successfully resisted the Italians, and Liberia which the US established for freed American and African slaves. The impact on Africa was disastrous, and it was not until the decolonization started in the 1950s that the Africans could start to decide about their own lives and societies.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/df/Henry_Morton_Stanley_1.jpg
Henry Morton Stanley.

The General Act of the Berlin Conference was signed by representatives of the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Spain, the United States of America, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal, Russia, Sweden-Norway, and Turkey (Ottoman Empire).
 
Sources
 
More information
 
I am open to your comments and proposals.
Warmly
Bjarte Bjørsvik

25. februar 2014

Khrushchev denounces Stalin

On 25 February 1956 Soviet leader Khrushchev denounces Stalin in a closed session at the 20th Congress of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union. In this famous secret speech he details how Stalin caused mass terror in the 1930s, ordered torture and murder of innocent high-ranking party members, failed to prepare for the Nazi invasion and cultivated his own personality. This kind of criticism is unheard of in the Soviet Union, and the delegates are stunned, some get a heart attack, others reportedly commit suicide afterwards. Another address Khrushchev gave at the start of the Congress is also important as he rejects the notion that war between East and West is “fatalistically inevitable”.



http://global.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/316972/Nikita-Sergeyevich-Khrushchev
Khrushchev addressing the 20th Congress of the Communist Party in 1956.
Encyclopædia Britannica, AFP/Getty Images.
International reactions
A Reuters correspondent gets details of the speech from a Russian source and he breaks the story internationally in the beginning of March. Poland revolts in October; Khrushchev flies to Warsaw and allows them some freedom. In Hungary independent –minded people take matters into their own hands and break out of the Warsaw pact and hold free elections. The Soviet response is swift and brutal, and in the shadow of the Suez Crisis, they invade and crush the Hungarian uprising.
But for a time Khrushchev improves relations with the West and signs a Nuclear Test-Ban Treaty in 1963. Then an arms race starts. His mishandling of agricultural reforms in Russia and the Cuba missile crisis alarms the Soviet leadership, and they force him to resign in 1964.
Mao Zedong, the leader of China co-operated well and had a lot in common with Stalin. He rejects the speech and Khrushchev and this initiate the split between the two Communist giants. It was never healed, and US President Nixon widened the split by his visit to China in 1971.


http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c5/Bundesarchiv_Bild_183-B0628-0015-035%2C_Nikita_S._Chruschtschow.jpg
Khrushchev in East Berlin, 1963.


Domestic policy
The speech is read to groups of Communist party activists, but not printed (until 1989). But it causes shock and disillusion to many who believed in Stalin and unity of the Communist party. But a period called the Khrushchev thaw starts with release of prisoners from the Gulag camps and less repression. Censorship is relaxed and some books like Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn’s book “One day in the life of Ivan Denisovich” are permitted. Others, like Nobel Prize for literature winner Boris Pasternak who wrote “Doctor Zhivago” is ejected from the Union of Soviet Writers. He dies soon after, partly because of the harsh treatment he got.


Most of the minorities that Stalin deported during and after World War II, are welcomed back to their homelands. Those include the Chechen, Ingush and other national groups. But not the Volga Germans and Crimean Tatars as Russians and Ukrainians had replaced them. In 1954 Khrushchev gives Crimea to Ukraine. Today in 2014 the Russians in Crimea are in conflict with Kiev and the Tatars in Crimea.



Author Solzhenitsyn was freed from exile and exonerated in 1956. In 1974 he was deported, here in West Germany.
Author Solzhenitsyn was freed from exile and exonerated in 1956. I
In 1974 he was deported, here in West Germany.
 
I am open to your comments and proposals.
Warmly
Bjarte Bjørsvik

24. februar 2014

The Baghdad pact collapses

On 24 February 1955 Iraq, Iran, Pakistan, the UK and Turkey sign the Baghdad Pact. This was part of a US plan to contain the Soviet Union. The idea was to prevent communist intrusions and support peace in the region, as the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and Southeast Asia Treaty Organization (SEATO) did.  Turkey was the easternmost country of NATO, and Pakistan was the westernmost country of SEATO defence pact. The Baghdad Pact was to fill the gap between them. The US didn’t become a member, but an observer and made bilateral agreements with each country. The Suez Crisis in 1956 led to fall in the UK’s position in the Middle East and its leadership of CENTO. After a revolution in Iraq in 1958, the new leadership took the country out of the pact the year after, and moved closer to the Soviet Union.

The pact was renamed Central Treaty Organization (CENTO), and the headquarters moved from Baghdad to Ankara. The UK had aircrafts with nuclear arms stationed in Cyprus, but CENTO didn’t create a permanent military command and armed forces. And the alliance never gave the members means of collective defence. Pakistan tried in vain to get CENTO’s support in the wars against India in 1965 and 1971. But CENTO worked as a conduit for economic and technical cooperation. The Soviet Union gained influence in Egypt, Syria, Iraq, Yemen, Somalia, Libya and Algeria. The Iranian revolution of 1979 led Khomeini to power and Iran withdrew from CENTO. Pakistan seeing no use of it anymore withdrew from the organization the same year and it collapsed in 1979.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/6b/F-4Es_50th_TFW_in_Iran_1977.JPEG
F-4 Phantom II aircraft in Iran during a Cento exercise
The Cold War focus provided little support to democratization and human rights in the member countries. They remained led by autocratic elites, and revolutions in two of them showed the failing military focus of the organization. I think more support to other pronounced US goals: free elections and freedom of organization, speech and press, would have led these countries and the region in a very different direction and situation today. I find these lessons relevant today, as there are still many regimes in the Middle East, asking for and getting US military support, with little focus on freedom and justice. A change in US strategy will help many people.


http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/df/Cento_zoom.svg
The member countries of CENTO in green
Background
After World War II, the Middle East got the superpowers attention for the first time. Europe was a more central arena in the Cold War between the US and the Soviet Union, and East and South East Asia with the Korea and Vietnam wars was hotter. Still the Middle East was an important Cold War arena. In 1946, George Kennan, a US diplomat in Moscow wrote an article in Foreign Affairs “The Sources of Soviet Conduct”. The popularized thesis of it grew over the years into the idea to construct a chain of military alliances around the Soviet Union. NATO became the first and most important one, followed by the Southeast Asia Treaty Organization (SEATO) and Baghdad Pact in 1955.  

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/93/Flag_of_CENTO.svg
The CENTO flag.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/77/Map_of_SEATO_member_countries_-_de.svg
SEATO members in dark blue, their colonies in light blue.
Sources and more information
Eisenhower Doctrine 1957. http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=11007&st=&st1=
Rashid Khalidi, Sowing crisis The Cold war and American dominance in the Middle East, p. 83-84, 179-80, Beacon Press Boston, Massachusetts, US 2009.
http://www.historyguide.org/europe/kennan.html
http://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/baghdad.asp
http://global.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/102693/Central-Treaty-Organization-CENTO
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_Treaty_Organization
http://history.state.gov/milestones/1953-1960/cento
http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/central-treaty-organization-cento-a-mutual-defense-and-economic-cooperation-pact-among-persia-turkey-and-pakistan-wi
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/int/cento.htm
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00263200903009676
Video 2 min.: https://archive.org/details/1958-01-30_Baghdad_pact

I am open to your comments and proposals.
Warmly
Bjarte Bjørsvik